this episode is just fitted well with today's news on sina microblog. i fanned many magnizes and newspapaer in sina. one of the hottest topics today is the execution of Thailand killer who killed one or two chinese fishers last year. almost all of the media reported this news as its headline, and some of them even entitled it as "live" report. how familiar is it with this short movie! over-consumed media has become a criminal which takes any measure to meet the demands of the audience and readers. how about the one who was read and judged?
they are human beings who also enjoys human rights. it is so cruel.
澳门凯旋门在线注册 ,i can not stand such a film, because it is too dark!
in fact , it is the audiences who are the most pathetic. they feed on fast information, to some degree, some parts of their life are controlled by media. they feel anxious when they can not get some junk information like some entertainment news. their emotion and thought are manipulated by computer and smart phones! what else can they do during their spare time ? nothing! they are disgusting parasites of fast information!
the next one is the orgnizer of the shooting in this movie. he is the meanest of all. he sees through the psychology of the audience, from which he can obtain reputation and money. this kind of people is also pathetic, because they want to be the focus of everyone. once somebody ignores them, they get insane and blue. another way around, they are the parasite of the attention of the audience.
the last one is the heroine. she makes us think about how to draw a line between vitues and vices. she maybe do something very bad, which drives people into anguish and ultimate anger. it is this feeling deceives people to believe that whatever happen to her, she deserves it. this sitution pushes the heroine to a publishment without boundary.
in a word, it is surrealism. overdone, i can't bear it. and i will never watch it again.

                  Technology alter human conception of real life refer to The Matrix

So earlier this year, I was informed that I would be doing a TED Talk. So I was excited, then I panicked, then I was excited, then I panicked, and in between the excitement and the panicking, I started to do my research, and my research primarily consisted of Googling how to give a great TED Talk.

The Meaning of The Trumen Show

The Matrix was not only a successful science fiction film directed by The Wachowskis, but it was also a wake-up call for the society of the 21st century. This film emphasized the idea that artificial intelligence is controlling human. Indeed, technology help human in many aspects, in the meanwhile human are turning into slaves of the machines they created. A more personalized and humane society are needed. This essay will focus on the technology alter human conception of real life and the relationship between technology and humanity.


In the last few years, America has undergone a significant cultural change. Previously, almost no criticism of the media reached the public, except for some of the complaints of business interests and conservatives. The media controlled the "means of communication" and it used that power to censor virtually all discussion of its own role in shaping events

Modern technology was created to help human. In order to liberate mankind’s time, human have invented intelligent technology, it can do most of human work even some of activities which human cannot complete, such as deep-sea detecting and space exploration. Machines’ working based on human commands, however machines perhaps will have their own consciousness if advanced technology still growing. For example, as the film The Matrix describes the network create a world by itself without human’s order and then fight with human. Machines and technology will exist in the form of human thinking and finally beyond the human, due to the powerful database. In the film The Matrix, people live at the end of 20th century which was built by artificial intelligence, they live and have social contact normally. In the contrary, the real world has already entered the 22nd century and human were grown and enslaved by machines. Some people united together to resisted the unreal world during the two spaces. , thus technology not only the biggest enemy, but also the formidable weapon. In the first section, the filmmaker use a pre-credit sequence which a mysterious woman in black avoid being caught by the police to attract the attention of the audience and make the audience confused about the power of the woman. The major characters took codes and phones as bridge between two worlds. According to this film, the director used several close-up camera angles to show that phone has an important role in the film, it can be the transport station because it exists everywhere. Phones symbolized human advanced way of communication, everyone has smart phone in the modern society, and communication way evaluated from make a phone call to use diverse social media, this is the progress of mankind, people’s life become convenient. In addition, the filmmaker use amount of tracking shot to show the distinction between performance and fantasy such as the protagonist Neo learned jujitsu during transmit data in mind, also he went to the matrix with the team. It is the best way to highlight the process of transformation and attract the attention of the audience. A few birds’ eye view shot in the film show the busy city, citizen using technology to live with ignorance and orderly. Technology as the instruments can do everything that human wanted, technology totally assist mankind in daily lives and completely is beneficial to human beings.

And interspersed with that, I was Googling Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. How many of you know who that is?

But now -- at last -- we are starting to get some public debate over the way the media manipulates public opinion and routinely creates fictions that masquerade as facts. The change has taken place in large measure because the media itself has become so powerful and so out of control, there is no longer any way for it to keep what it is doing under wraps.

However, technology alter mankind conception of reality, sunglasses play an important role in this film. They all wear sunglasses, Agent Smith, Morpheus and other charterers who know that matrix is not real. They wear sunglasses to protect themselves, because matrix is regarded as evil as artificial intelligence has taken control of the world and imprisoned the minds of mankind. Combined with real, at present people do not believe “Seeing is believing” anymore because of the techniques that can convince people such as PS or video effects. People spent hours communicating with other members of the society through the internet, put imagines on social media and wait others’ praises. Communication through virtual world has become more common than communicate face-to-face. Social media nickname similar to the sunglasses, although users hide themselves under it they can still connect with others, know the news immediately in the internet. Although they become unsociable, the users still have suitable conversations in social media. A number of adolescent indulged violence video games then committed crimes or dead in the real world because they confused the two worlds, the young person took virtual as the real. The accelerated pace of life bring people into a fast world, people ignored the nature. People thought enough technology can change everything, but still helpless when a terrible earthquake happened. People forgot what was real, because everyone live in a world which full of messages, electricity, and instruments and permit them to dominate people’s lives. Mankind is gradually losing humanity.


Ironically, one of the voices that is being raised against it is none other than that of the ultimate media machine, Hollywood. While celebrities take on the tabloid photographers who follow them around, the movie and television industry is giving us depictions of venal reporters and scheming entertainment conglomerates, which pull no punches when it comes to revealing how amoral our culture industry has become.

In my opinion, technology has already merely assist people but determine how modern lives’ mode. Mankind will be so dependent on technology that they cannot survive without it. For example, I did not finish the homework one day without technology because I was woken by the alarm clock, have not started is over. Machines occupied the time of people’s life, telephone and social media instead of talking and robots replace human work. Mankind probably become lazier than before, and the worst outcome will be the artificial intelligence smarter than human and has own cognize perceive, in the meanwhile human beings will lose their faith. If human become knowledgeable occur within a few minutes, education will be meaningless, all people are genius and want to be the leader, the social will fall into disorder.

So I was Googling her because I always Google her because I'm just a fan, but also because she always has important and interesting things to say. And the combination of those searches kept leading me to her talk on the dangers of a single story, on what happens when we have a solitary lens through which to understand certain groups of people, and it is the perfect talk. It's the talk that I would have given if I had been famous first.

Recently, there have been two important examples of this trend. In the flawed but interesting movie, Bulworth, Hollywood has given us a depiction of a politician who challenges the phony world of media-politics by offering bluntness in place of rhetorical manipulation. In the brilliantly-conceived (and imperfectly executed) satire, The Truman Show, it shows us a character who also challenges -- and ultimately escapes from -- a contrived world that is an invention of media. Both movies have the same message: we will have to stand up to the manipulators of television and news if we want to protect ourselves from the absurdity and falsehood that now surrounds us at every turn.

To sum up, what happened in the film could become true in the future if mankind develop the science and technology without restraint. Technology not merely assist mankind in people’s lives, the director uses a variety of filming techniques to gives audiences truth. People are losing their faith and technology alter mankind conception of reality, the rule of human thinking is dangerous. Additionally, it remind people should come back to the real world and to be treated humanity well and protect it.


As most people know by now, The Truman Show conveys this message by depicting a series of fateful events in the life of Truman Burbank, (played by Jim Carrey) who has grown up, and lives, in a fake town full of actors. The town is enclosed in a giant dome decked out with high-tech simulations of sun and sky, in which the rain and wind are courtesy of the special effects department. Truman alone has no idea he is in a giant TV studio, as the rest of humanity watches him go from one staged situation to another in a nonstop telethon of reality programming that lets audiences enjoy a little pathos and vicarious emotion.

You know, and you know, like, she's African and I'm African, and she's a feminist and I'm a feminist, and she's a storyteller and I'm a storyteller, so I really felt like it's my talk.

But into this ersatz paradise, there inevitably appears a snake. After the crew makes mistakes that cause the seamlessness of the illusion to break down, Truman figures out that his surroundings are full of staged scenes and events. He then tries to make his escape, only to come up against both his own fears, which keep him from leaving, and the obstacles put in his way by the producer-director who has made billions trapping him in a stage set and playing God with his life.



So I decided that I was going to learn how to code, and then I was going to hack the internet and I would take down all the copies of that talk that existed, and then I would memorize it, and then I would come here and deliver it as if it was my own speech. So that plan was going really well, except the coding part, and then one morning a few months ago, I woke up to the news that the wife of a certain presidential candidate had given a speech that --



Thus does the movie offer us a metaphor for our own situation. The fake landscape Truman lives in is our own media landscape in which news, politics, advertising and public affairs are increasingly made up of theatrical illusions. Like our media landscape, it is convincing in its realism, with lifelike simulations and story lines, from the high-tech facsimile of a sun that benevolently beams down on Truman to the mock sincerity of the actor he mistakenly believes is his best friend. It is also rewarding and masquerades as something benevolent. And it is seamless -- there are almost no flaws that give away the illusion -- at least until things start to go wrong.


Truman's fear of leaving this invented world, once he realizes it is a fraud, is similarly like our own reluctance to break our symbiotic relationship with media. His growing suspicion that what he is seeing is staged for his benefit is our own suspicions as the media-fabricated illusions around us begin to break down. And the producer-director of this stage-set world, who blocks Truman's effort to escape, is the giant media companies, news organizations, and media-politicians that have a stake in keeping us surrounded by falsehood, and are prepared to lure us with rewards as they block efforts at reforming the system.

that sounded eerily like a speech given by one of my other faves, Michelle Obama.

What gives this metaphor life is the way the movie depicts two attitudes we routinely take toward media. In one, we are absorbed by it; we accept its rendition of reality because it occupies our view. We are like children whose parents define their world. The lifelikeness and seamlessness of media fabrications and the fact that they are entertaining, help induce this attitude in us. We frequently experience it while reading news stories and watching television and movies.


In the second attitude, we distance ourselves from media. We examine its meaning and try to understand the intentions of its authors. This second attitude is what makes criticism -- and freedom -- possible.

And so I decided that I should probably write my own TED Talk, and so that is what I am here to do. I'm here to talk about my own observations about storytelling. I want to talk to you about the power of stories, of course, but I also want to talk about their limitations, particularly for those of us who are interested in social justice.

In life, we frequently switch from one attitude to another and mix them together. In watching television, we may easily become absorbed in the program. Then something will jar us out of our spell, such as a breakdown in the illusion or the expression of ideas we disagree with. As a result, we will suddenly distance ourselves from what we are watching, and perhaps ridicule it or suspect the intentions of its creators. The critics of media have been trying to get us to cultivate this second attitude, so we will see through the falsehood we are offered on a daily basis.

So since Adichie gave that talk seven years ago, there has been a boom in storytelling. Stories are everywhere, and if there was a danger in the telling of one tired old tale, then I think there has got to be lots to celebrate about the flourishing of so many stories and so many voices. Stories are the antidote to bias. In fact, today, if you are middle class and connected via the internet, you can download stories at the touch of a button or the swipe of a screen. You can listen to a podcast about what it's like to grow up Dalit in Kolkata. You can hear an indigenous man in Australia talk about the trials and triumphs of raising his children in dignity and in pride. Stories make us fall in love. They heal rifts and they bridge divides. Stories can even make it easier for us to talk about the deaths of people in our societies who don't matter, because they make us care. Right?

The movie depicts just such a change in attitude as a transformation in the way Truman sees his surroundings and as a physical journey. First, Truman is absorbed by his stage-set world. He is convinced it is real and it occupies his view. Then, as a result of flaws in the seamlessness of the illusion, he begins to question it. He develops a healthy paranoia -- are they watching him; can he know what is authentic? As he makes his escape, and the producer of the show blocks him at every turn, that is the creators of the movie telling us that we too have to take a journey -- of mind -- and distance ourselves from this media landscape, if we want to secure our freedom.

I'm not so sure, and I actually work for a place called the Centre for Stories. And my job is to help to tell stories that challenge mainstream narratives about what it means to be black or a Muslim or a refugee or any of those other categories that we talk about all the time. But I come to this work after a long history as a social justice activist, and so I'm really interested in the ways that people talk about nonfiction storytelling as though it's about more than entertainment, as though it's about being a catalyst for social action. It's not uncommon to hear people say that stories make the world a better place. Increasingly, though, I worry that even the most poignant stories, particularly the stories about people who no one seems to care about, can often get in the way of action towards social justice. Now, this is not because storytellers mean any harm. Quite the contrary. Storytellers are often do-gooders like me and, I suspect, yourselves. And the audiences of storytellers are often deeply compassionate and empathetic people. Still, good intentions can have unintended consequences, and so I want to propose that stories are not as magical as they seem. So three -- because it's always got to be three -- three reasons why I think that stories don't necessarily make the world a better place.

The movie also depicts the critics who invite us to see through media illusions in the form of characters who try to warn Truman he is on television. Most notably, there is the woman who reveals to him that he is on TV, before she is removed from the set. His dream of finding her is also the dream that, at first, he doesn't know he has, of finding the truth of the outside world, where there are genuine relationship in place of the saccharin marriage he believes is authentic.

Firstly, stories can create an illusion of solidarity. There is nothing like that feel-good factor you get from listening to a fantastic story where you feel like you climbed that mountain, right, or that you befriended that death row inmate. But you didn't. You haven't done anything. Listening is an important but insufficient step towards social action.

The movie wants to play the role of just such a critic for us. It tells us to look around and break the spell that keeps us believing in the media-fabricated illusions of popular culture.

Secondly, I think often we are drawn towards characters and protagonists who are likable and human. And this makes sense, of course, right? Because if you like someone, then you care about them. But the inverse is also true. If you don't like someone, then you don't care about them. And if you don't care about them, you don't have to see yourself as having a moral obligation to think about the circumstances that shaped their lives.

Of course, the movie is also a form of media. As it conveys these ideas to us in dramatic form, we are absorbed by its own take on the meaning of things. Like Truman, we are manipulated and entertained by its lifelike simulations and story line. We identify with Truman and psychologically become a part of his world. So the movie uses the manipulations of media in order to manipulate us into seeing through the manipulations of media.

I learned this lesson when I was 14 years old. I learned that actually, you don't have to like someone to recognize their wisdom, and you certainly don't have to like someone to take a stand by their side. So my bike was stolen while I was riding it --

As with many other forms of media, we are enriched by allowing ourselves to be taken over by its theme. But we also need to create a more critical distance, escape its invented world, and think about its meaning and effect on us, so we can use it to enhance our perceptions instead of allowing it to use us.


What is said here is true of all media -- including this site. It too seeks to draw you in; to try to structure your perception of things. It too requires a critical distance, so you can use it to enhance your perceptions and not merely be manipulated by it.

which is possible if you're riding slowly enough, which I was.

That brings us to another element depicted in the movie -- you (and me). The movie isn't only a satire of television and other forms of media. It aims many of its most pointed barbs at us, the audience. After all, as we watch the characters hanging on Truman's every expression so they can feel something, that is us we see depicted on the screen. We are the one's who make this system possible, the movie tells us. The willingness of the audience to exploit Truman so it can enjoy his life as entertainment is our own willingness to exploit an endless parade of human victims of news and reality programming because they have the misfortune to be part of some "newsworthy" event. And both the audience and Truman portray our willingness to experience an easier and more exciting substitute for life, which is what fuels the media machine.


So Truman and the audience depict us. We're the villains and victims and hero of The Truman Show. And, ultimately, the only illusions we have to escape are the ones we create ourselves.

So one minute I'm cutting across this field in the Nairobi neighborhood where I grew up, and it's like a very bumpy path, and so when you're riding a bike, you don't want to be like, you know --


And so I'm going like this, slowly pedaling, and all of a sudden, I'm on the floor. I'm on the ground, and I look up, and there's this kid peddling away in the getaway vehicle, which is my bike, and he's about 11 or 12 years old, and I'm on the floor, and I'm crying because I saved a lot of money for that bike, and I'm crying and I stand up and I start screaming. Instinct steps in, and I start screaming, "Mwizi, mwizi!" which means "thief" in Swahili. And out of the woodworks, all of these people come out and they start to give chase. This is Africa, so mob justice in action. Right? And I round the corner, and they've captured him, they've caught him. The suspect has been apprehended, and they make him give me my bike back, and they also make him apologize. Again, you know, typical African justice, right? And so they make him say sorry. And so we stand there facing each other, and he looks at me, and he says sorry, but he looks at me with this unbridled fury. He is very, very angry. And it is the first time that I have been confronted with someone who doesn't like me simply because of what I represent. He looks at me with this look as if to say, "You, with your shiny skin and your bike, you're angry at me?"

So it was a hard lesson that he didn't like me, but you know what, he was right. I was a middle-class kid living in a poor country. I had a bike, and he barely had food. Sometimes, it's the messages that we don't want to hear, the ones that make us want to crawl out of ourselves, that we need to hear the most. For every lovable storyteller who steals your heart, there are hundreds more whose voices are slurred and ragged, who don't get to stand up on a stage dressed in fine clothes like this. There are a million angry-boy-on-a-bike stories and we can't afford to ignore them simply because we don't like their protagonists or because that's not the kid that we would bring home with us from the orphanage.

The third reason that I think that stories don't necessarily make the world a better place is that too often we are so invested in the personal narrative that we forget to look at the bigger picture. And so we applaud someone when they tell us about their feelings of shame, but we don't necessarily link that to oppression. We nod understandingly when someone says they felt small, but we don't link that to discrimination. The most important stories, especially for social justice, are those that do both, that are both personal and allow us to explore and understand the political.

But it's not just about the stories we like versus the stories we choose to ignore. Increasingly, we are living in a society where there are larger forces at play, where stories are actually for many people beginning to replace the news. Yeah? We live in a time where we are witnessing the decline of facts, when emotions rule and analysis, it's kind of boring, right? Where we value what we feel more than what we actually know. A recent report by the Pew Center on trends in America indicates that only 10 percent of young adults under the age of 30 "place a lot of trust in the media." Now, this is significant. It means that storytellers are gaining trust at precisely the same moment that many in the media are losing the confidence in the public. This is not a good thing, because while stories are important and they help us to have insights in many ways, we need the media. From my years as a social justice activist, I know very well that we need credible facts from media institutions combined with the powerful voices of storytellers. That's what pushes the needle forward in terms of social justice.

In the final analysis, of course, it is justice that makes the world a better place, not stories. Right? And so if it is justice that we are after, then I think we mustn't focus on the media or on storytellers. We must focus on audiences, on anyone who has ever turned on a radio or listened to a podcast, and that means all of us.

So a few concluding thoughts on what audiences can do to make the world a better place. So firstly, the world would be a better place, I think, if audiences were more curious and more skeptical and asked more questions about the social context that created those stories that they love so much. Secondly, the world would be a better place if audiences recognized that storytelling is intellectual work. And I think it would be important for audiences to demand more buttons on their favorite websites, buttons for example that say, "If you liked this story, click here to support a cause your storyteller believes in." Or "click here to contribute to your storyteller's next big idea." Often, we are committed to the platforms, but not necessarily to the storytellers themselves. And then lastly, I think that audiences can make the world a better place by switching off their phones, by stepping away from their screens and stepping out into the real world beyond what feels safe.

Alice Walker has said, "Look closely at the present you are constructing. It should look like the future you are dreaming." Storytellers can help us to dream, but it's up to all of us to have a plan for justice.

Thank you.


Ctrl+D 将本页面保存为书签,全面了解最新资讯,方便快捷。